HR Management Software

Essential HR tools to help you manage people and compliance with confidence.

> See plans & pricing

Plans & Pricing

Affordable plans to meet every business need and budget.

Not ready for a plan?
See our pay as you go options

HR News

Keep informed and up-to-date about important HR and employment laws matters. Access tips to help you achieve a more productive workforce.

> Subscribe to get our newsletter/updates

Why BetterHR?

We’ve helped over 10,000 business owners and managers like you – and we’ve never lost a claim!

> Explainer Video

Contact us

A BetterHR plan gives you access to cost effective HR software and HR services. Contact us to learn more.

Open: Mon to Fri – 9am to 5pm AEST

Not yet a subscriber?

Already a subscriber?

The operators of a hair products retailing business have been penalised more than $70,000 for exploiting vulnerable overseas workers.

Melbourne couple Haim Tomer Diamond and Rina Diamond have been penalised $30,600 and $40,000 respectively, in the Federal Circuit Court for underpaying employees $34,915.

At a hearing in December last year, the couple were ordered to pay outstanding amounts of $17,247 to 11 employees at two retail kiosks operated by the Diamonds at the Chadstone and Northland shopping centres.

The employees were mostly young, overseas workers on student or working holiday visas.

Mr and Mrs Diamond’s company, Corioliss Pty Ltd, was placed into external administration late last year and was not pursued in Court.

The penalties and back-pay orders imposed by Judge Norah Hartnett are the result of an investigation and legal action by the Fair Work Ombudsman.

Judge Hartnett found that the contraventions were “clearly deliberate”.

Mrs Diamond was singled out for her lack of genuine contrition, and for threatening one of the workers.

Judge Hartnett found that Mrs Diamond had threatened to notify the Department of Immigration and Border Protection that one international student employee had been working more than the 20 hours per week allowed under her visa unless the student withdrew her complaint to the Fair Work Ombudsman.

Mrs Diamond sent the student an email stating: Your limit of 20 hours work as a student was not kept as it should. I have to forward this information to the immigration unless the complaint will be cancelled by you.

Judge Hartnett said the statement “exhibits a concerning awareness of the employee’s vulnerability and a willingness to exploit such vulnerability to the Respondents’ benefit”.

Mr and Mrs Diamond had been placed on notice of their obligations to pay minimum rates of pay to employees, with the Fair Work Ombudsman previously issuing a Letter of Caution as a result of earlier investigations.

Despite this, Mr and Mrs Diamond’s business paid 10 out of the 11 employees rates held to be “grossly less than the lawful rates”, of between $7.86 and $14.90 per hour, for work performed between July 2014 and January 2015. This led to significant underpayments of their minimum hourly rates, weekend and public holiday penalty rates, casual loadings and minimum engagement pay.

The largest individual underpayment was $4434.

When Fair Work inspectors received an underpayment allegation and investigated, Mrs Diamond further contravened workplace laws by knowingly providing inspectors with false and misleading records.

The Fair Work Ombudsman says the Court’s judgment serves as yet another warning that deliberately exploiting vulnerable workers is extremely serious conduct that will not be tolerated.

Employers should be aware that the Fair Work Amendment (Protecting Vulnerable Workers) Act 2017 has now come into effect, increasing the maximum penalties for conduct including deliberate exploitation of workers and false records.

Need help with HR and Compliance?

Contact Better HR.