Plans & Pricing

Affordable plans to meet every business need and budget.

Not sure which plan?

We’re here to assist. Book a demo:

HR News

Keep informed and up-to-date about important HR and employment laws matters. Access tips to help you achieve a more productive workforce.

> Subscribe to get our newsletter/updates

Why BetterHR?

We’ve helped thousands of business owners and managers like you – and we’ve never lost a claim!

> Explainer Video

Contact us

Open: Mon to Fri – 9am to 5pm AEST

> General enquiries

Not yet a subscriber?

Already a subscriber?

The former owner-operator of medical centres in Perth and Sydney has been fined $22,176 over the underpayment of nine employees.

Sydney man Tufiq Shah operated more than a dozen medical centres through his company General Practice Support Services before the company was placed under administration last year.

The penalty, handed down in the Federal Circuit Court in Sydney, is the result of legal action by the Fair Work Ombudsman.

Justice Kenneth Raphael ordered that the penalty be paid to the underpaid employees to partially rectify the underpayments.

Nine employees of Shah’s company at two centres in Perth and one in Sydney were underpaid a total of $70,973 in wages, leave and superannuation entitlements.

The majority of the underpayments relate to the Mends Street Medical Centre, in South Perth, where six employees, a practice manager, receptionist, two nurses and two General Practitioners were underpaid $57,983.

A practice manager at the Seville Drive Medical Centre at Armadale was also underpaid $5324.

Two employees, a manager and a manager/receptionist, at the Rosebery Medical & Dental Centre at Alexandria, in Sydney, were underpaid a total of $7666.

The underpayments were primarily the result of Shah’s company ceasing payments to employees in the weeks before it stopped operating the centres. It had also failed to pay superannuation entitlements prior to that.

Fair Work inspectors discovered the underpayments when they investigated employee complaints.

Fair Work Ombudsman Natalie James Fair Work said the non-payment of fundamental entitlements was a significant factor in the decision to pursue legal action.

“The Court’s decision sends a clear message that underpayment of employee entitlements is a serious matter,” she said.

Source: Fair Work Ombudsman Media Release