HR Management Software

Essential HR tools to help you manage people and compliance with confidence.

> See plans & pricing

Plans & Pricing

Affordable plans to meet every business need and budget.

Not ready for a plan?
See our pay as you go options

HR News

Keep informed and up-to-date about important HR and employment laws matters. Access tips to help you achieve a more productive workforce.

> Subscribe to get our newsletter/updates

Why BetterHR?

We’ve helped over 10,000 business owners and managers like you – and we’ve never lost a claim!

> Explainer Video

Contact us

A BetterHR plan gives you access to cost effective HR software and HR services. Contact us to learn more.

Open: Mon to Fri – 9am to 5pm AEST

Not yet a subscriber?

Already a subscriber?

The Fair Work Ombudsman has commenced legal action in the Federal Circuit Court against the operator of a Melbourne hairdressing salon.

Facing court is Jorge Guillermo Viota, who operates the ‘Jorge Viota Hairdressers and Barbers’ salon on Lygon Street in Brunswick East.

The regulator investigated after receiving a request for assistance from a worker who had been employed on a casual basis as a hairdressing assistant at the salon.

A Fair Work Inspector issued a Compliance Notice in March this year after forming a belief that Mr Viota had failed to pay the employee her full wages and entitlements for work performed between December 2015 and December 2017.

The inspector believed that the employee, who was aged 18 to 20 at the time, had been underpaid her weekday casual rate, Saturday casual rate and public holiday penalty rate under the Hair and Beauty Industry Award 2010.

The Fair Work Ombudsman alleges that Mr Viota, without reasonable excuse, failed to comply with the Compliance Notice. The notice required him to calculate and back-pay the workers’ entitlements.

The Fair Work Ombudsman is seeking a penalty against Mr Viota and court orders requiring him to comply with the Compliance Notice (which includes rectifying any underpayments in full), plus interest.

Mr Viota faces a maximum penalty of $6,300. A directions hearing is listed in the Federal Circuit Court in Melbourne on 27 October 2020.