Plans & Pricing

Affordable plans to meet every business need and budget.

Not sure which plan?

We’re here to assist. Book a demo:

HR News

Keep informed and up-to-date about important HR and employment laws matters. Access tips to help you achieve a more productive workforce.

> Subscribe to get our newsletter/updates

Why BetterHR?

We’ve helped over 10,000 business owners and managers like you – and we’ve never lost a claim!

> Explainer Video

Contact us

Open: Mon to Fri – 9am to 5pm AEST

Please be advised we will be closing for Christmas:

  • From: 17 December 2021 – 5pm AEDT
  • Re-opening: 10 January 2022 – 9am AEDT

Not yet a subscriber?

Already a subscriber?

The Fair Work Ombudsman has commenced legal action in court against the operators of a Melbourne-based company that makes aluminium windows and doors.

Facing court is Innovative Aluminium Pty Ltd, which employed workers in the ‘Innovative Aluminium’ business in the south-east Melbourne suburb of Mulgrave, and company director Spiro Douvitsas.

The regulator began an investigation after receiving a request for assistance from a worker employed at Innovative Aluminium as a project manager between January 2019 and September 2020.

A Fair Work Inspector issued a Compliance Notice to Innovative Aluminium in April 2021 after forming a belief the worker had not been paid two weeks’ pay in lieu of notice of termination, which he was entitled to under the National Employment Standards.

The FWO alleges Innovative Aluminium, without reasonable excuse, failed to comply with the Compliance Notice, which required the calculation and back-payment of the worker’s outstanding entitlements. It’s alleged Mr Douvitsas was involved in the contravention.

Fair Work Ombudsman Sandra Parker said the regulator would continue to enforce workplace laws in a proportionate manner during the COVID-19 pandemic and take business operators to court where lawful requests are not complied with.

The FWO is seeking penalties against Innovative Aluminium Pty Ltd and Mr Douvitsas. The company faces a maximum penalty of up to $33,000, while Mr Douvitsas faces a maximum penalty of $6,600.

The regulator is also seeking an order for the company to comply with the Compliance Notice, which includes rectifying any underpayments in full, plus interest and superannuation.

A directions hearing is listed in the Federal Circuit and Family Court in Melbourne on 27 October 2021.

Important Notice re Copyright:

The information above is produced by the Fair Work Ombudsman – ‘© Fair Work Ombudsman www.fairwork.gov.au‘.)

This information has been shared to help business owners and managers understand and comply with their legal obligations under Australian employment laws.

There is no connection, sponsorship or endorsement between BetterHR, BetterHR products &/or services and the Commonwealth of Australia (or any of its agencies, including the Fair Work Ombudsman).