Plans & Pricing

Affordable plans to meet every business need and budget.

Not sure which plan?

We’re here to assist. Book a demo:

HR News

Keep informed and up-to-date about important HR and employment laws matters. Access tips to help you achieve a more productive workforce.

> Subscribe to get our newsletter/updates

Why BetterHR?

We’ve helped thousands of business owners and managers like you – and we’ve never lost a claim!

> Explainer Video

Contact us

Open: Mon to Fri – 9am to 5pm AEST

> General enquiries

Not yet a subscriber?

Already a subscriber?

Qantas will no longer have to backpay hundreds of workers after the Full Federal Court overturned a recent landmark decision that companies have to pass on the full JobKeeper wage subsidy.

The win was a relief not just for Qantas, but other companies who have had to backpay workers based on the court’s initial interpretation of the law relating to the Federal Government’s JobKeeper wage subsidy.

In September, the Federal Court ruled against Qantas’ interpretation of the JobKeeper wage subsidy program.

Justice Geoffrey Flick had found the airline had paid workers less than they should have received. But Qantas appealed the decision and on Tuesday the Full Federal Court ruled in the airline’s favour.

A Qantas spokesman told ABC News the airline was pleased with the decision.

“We have always made JobKeeper payments to our employees according to advice from the Australian Tax Office (ATO),” the airline’s spokesman said.

“Most of the JobKeeper payments Qantas has received went straight to employees who were stood down.”

Under the ATO’s written guidance, it states that “regardless of the frequency of regular pay cycles or out-of-cycle pay periods, or the pay period start and end dates, the $1,500 per fortnight applies to the paydays (payment date) within the defined fortnights and from which fixed fortnight the payment applies”.

Why the decision was overturned

The Transport Workers’ Union (TWU) and the Australian Services Union (ASU) argued in court that the airline refused to pay workers for public holidays, weekends, overtime work and allowances.

They had argued Qantas had “deliberately manipulated” JobKeeper so the airline would not have to pay workers a dollar more than the JobKeeper wage subsidy of $1,500 per fortnight (the rate at the time).

But Qantas argued that payments made in arrears to workers for doing overtime should be counted against the JobKeeper payments.

The court ultimately agreed. It accepted the airline’s argument that it could use workers’ earnings paid in arrears to reduce the top-up amount it must make to get their pay to the minimum $1,500 a fortnight required under JobKeeper.