Plans & Pricing

Affordable plans to meet every business need and budget.

Not sure which plan?

We’re here to assist. Book a demo:

HR News

Keep informed and up-to-date about important HR and employment laws matters. Access tips to help you achieve a more productive workforce.

> Subscribe to get our newsletter/updates

Why BetterHR?

We’ve helped thousands of business owners and managers like you – and we’ve never lost a claim!

> Explainer Video

Contact us

Open: Mon to Fri – 9am to 5pm AEST

> General enquiries

Not yet a subscriber?

Already a subscriber?

The Fair Work Ombudsman has secured court orders for more than $62,000 in penalties and back-payment against a trolley collection business operating in Tasmania and its director.

The Federal Circuit and Family Court has imposed a $16,650 penalty against Adept Trolly Collection Services Pty Ltd, which operated at Kmart sites in Launceston, Burnie and Devonport, and a $3,300 penalty against the company’s sole director, Ahlam Osman.

The penalty was imposed in response to Adept Trolly Collection Services Pty Ltd failing to comply with a Compliance Notice requiring it to back-pay five trolley collectors it employed across the three Kmart sites between June 2017 and April 2018. Mr Osman was involved in the contravention.

In addition to the penalty, the Court has ordered the company to back-pay the five workers a total of $42,502, plus superannuation and interest, with individual back-payments ranging from $1012 to $20,352.

The Fair Work Ombudsman commenced an investigation after receiving a request for assistance from a worker.

The Compliance Notice was issued in May 2021 after an inspector formed a belief that the workers had been underpaid entitlements under the Cleaning Services Award 2010 and Fair Work Act, including minimum wages, junior rates, public holiday pay, shift work loadings, and penalty rates for weekend, public holiday and overtime rates.

Judge Antoni Lucev found that the failure to comply with the Compliance Notice was deliberate, that four of the five workers had experienced substantial loss and that Adept Trolly Collection Services and Mr Osman had not expressed any regret or remorse.

Judge Lucev found that there was a need to impose penalties that would deter the company and Mr Osman, as well as other employers, from similar conduct in future.

“The effectiveness of general deterrence requires an amount of penalty sufficient to send a message that contraventions of this type are serious and not acceptable,” Judge Lucev said.